Fomapan 16mm Bizarre Processing

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

Will2
Senior member
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:18 am
Real name: Will Montgomery
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Fomapan 16mm Bizarre Processing

Post by Will2 »

I asked Spectra to process a couple test reels of 16mm Fomapan B&W Reversal and got the strangest results back.

On the lightest areas of the film, like on skys, it looks like the film is on fire. A strange noise just where these light areas are... the leaves in the forground are fine, but the sky looks like the flames of hell.

They understood that this film requires the old B&W reversal process and thought they could do it by speeding the film through the bleach process or something, but I wound up with this amazingly strange effect.

I'll try to take a still with my projector to post here since I probably won't transfer it.
richard p. t.
Senior member
Posts: 1004
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 3:44 pm
Location: victoria, Australia

Post by richard p. t. »

I had that result so so many times with Fomapan!
I (Nano lab) now get fine results with Fomapan using Kodak chemistry, but only by keeping any rolls of Fomapan that need developing for the very first use of a particular batch of chemistry. That said, I think this stock will almost always give trouble when used with continuous processing machines that replenish rather than replace their chemistry (and that is the normal proceedure).
I run Nano Lab - Australia's super8 ektachrome processing service
- visit nanolab.com.au
richard@nanolab.com.au
ccortez
Senior member
Posts: 2220
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:07 am
Location: Austin, Texas

Post by ccortez »

FVS did the same thing to 400' of the best stuff I ever shot -- it's bleach damage, sticks to the whites. Unfortunately, the whitest parts of many of my shots were faces... and little white easter dresses. :(
Will2
Senior member
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:18 am
Real name: Will Montgomery
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Post by Will2 »

I'm sure it has to do with bleach, here's a shot off the wall... hope no one else has to see it on their film.

The distorted sections are moving rapidly like really large noise, resembling a fire or something.

Image
User avatar
avr
Posts: 243
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 6:57 pm
Location: santiago de compostela (spain)
Contact:

Post by avr »

Yes it appears due to a bad bleach. In my first home develpments with lomo tank I had the same problem because in the bleach step I didn´t move the tank enought.

I had archieved great results with Foma R100. Andec has a good development but I prefer the home development because you can archieve better blacks and good contrast. Andec development is a bit flat.

I post a pic with the same problem.
Image
aj
Senior member
Posts: 3556
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 1:15 pm
Real name: Andre
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Post by aj »

I suppose it is part of the backing. This is to come off in the Bleach when using the Fomapan chemistry kits.

Usually these kits work fantastic when it is applied as singel shot. One time I experimentaly tried to reuse the chemistry within 45minutes after the first film and this second film had parts which looked like the shown images. I assume the bleach had lost its strength after the first run. The bleach comes out off the LOMO with a lot of dissolved material.
Kind regards,

André
User avatar
audadvnc
Senior member
Posts: 2079
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:15 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Post by audadvnc »

I am surprised that the "bad results with Fomapan and Kodak chemistry" issue keeps circulating on this board. It should be clear by now that Fomapan is an odd stock that requires its own chemistry for reliable processing. I don't think either Foma or Kodak make any claims otherwise.

Reminds me of someone putting gasoline in their diesel vehicle and complaining about the result. Isn't this an example of substance abuse?
Robert Hughes
thebigidea
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:29 pm

Post by thebigidea »

so is there a lab in America that handles Fomapan with decent results?
fritzcarraldo
Posts: 215
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 7:14 pm

Post by fritzcarraldo »

I've been using FOMAPAN for some years now, and i don't use any kit, i make my own chemicals and the results are great,

As a matter of facti, i never achieved such results with Kodak,

FOMAPAN has strong black, strong white and midtones like not many other stocks,

I'll get a frame of a film someday and post it here,

Regards
Will2
Senior member
Posts: 1983
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:18 am
Real name: Will Montgomery
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Post by Will2 »

audadvnc wrote:I am surprised that the "bad results with Fomapan and Kodak chemistry" issue keeps circulating on this board. It should be clear by now that Fomapan is an odd stock that requires its own chemistry for reliable processing. I don't think either Foma or Kodak make any claims otherwise.

Reminds me of someone putting gasoline in their diesel vehicle and complaining about the result. Isn't this an example of substance abuse?
I know, but they were pretty confident they could handle it. Other posts indicated that Kodak chemicals worked if the bleach step was timed differently. Yes, I learned my lesson.
David M. Leugers
Posts: 1632
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 12:42 am

Post by David M. Leugers »

My experiences with Fomapan have been a crap shoot. The only lab that I used that consistently gave good results was the now-defunct Franklin Film Lab, in California. Film and Video Services are capable of giving good results, but they have been unpredictable enough to where I am not sure I would use Fomapan on anything important. Since Plus-X is available in R-8mm, I see no reason to gamble on Fomapan anymore.


David M. Leugers
richard p. t.
Senior member
Posts: 1004
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 3:44 pm
Location: victoria, Australia

Post by richard p. t. »

fritzcarraldo wrote:I've been using FOMAPAN for some years now, and i don't use any kit, i make my own chemicals and the results are great,

As a matter of facti, i never achieved such results with Kodak,

FOMAPAN has strong black, strong white and midtones like not many other stocks,

I'll get a frame of a film someday and post it here,

Regards
Yes, but do you use your chemistry as a 'one shot' or do you find you can reuse your chemistry for several batches of films?

I don't believe this is a bleach issue.
I run Nano Lab - Australia's super8 ektachrome processing service
- visit nanolab.com.au
richard@nanolab.com.au
aj
Senior member
Posts: 3556
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 1:15 pm
Real name: Andre
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Post by aj »

richard p. t. wrote:
I don't believe this is a bleach issue.
No, indeed it is not the bleach itself. The bleach must deal with the backing coming off and gets contaminated too much with particles and looses strengh too much. So you cannot use it on more than one film.
Kind regards,

André
richard p. t.
Senior member
Posts: 1004
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 3:44 pm
Location: victoria, Australia

Post by richard p. t. »

Actually you will get the same results with fresh bleach but previously used first developer. As it happens I normally use bleach as a one shot anyway. I believe there is a by-product produced during the first development that subsequent foma films are sensitive to.
You can develop further Kodak and Orwo films in developer that has had Foma put through it, but Foma will produce this effect (and increasingly strongly with subsequent films) when the first developer has been used already (and used with either Kodak or Foma film). Funny, lovely, scary stuff. I purchased a reasonable quantity of this stock before I realised the development problem with it. I no longer sell it, but will process it - but only as the first film in a batch of developer. That way, it works well.
I run Nano Lab - Australia's super8 ektachrome processing service
- visit nanolab.com.au
richard@nanolab.com.au
ccortez
Senior member
Posts: 2220
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:07 am
Location: Austin, Texas

Post by ccortez »

All interesting information...

Does anyone believe there is any way to treat the damaged film to improve the condition? I've got a lomo tank, access to chemicals, and nothing to lose! ;)
Post Reply